Author Archives: Mike Shulman
As discussed at length on the mailing list some time ago, there are several different things that one might mean by saying that a function is “constant”. Here is my preferred terminology: is constant if we have such that for … Continue reading
The intent of this post is to address certain misconceptions that I’ve noticed regarding the HoTT Book and its role in relation to HoTT. (At least, I consider them misconceptions.) Overall, I think the HoTT Book project has been successful … Continue reading
I ended my last post about splitting idempotents with several open questions: If we have a map , a witness of idempotency , and a coherence datum , and we use them to split as in the previous post, do … Continue reading
A few days ago Martin Escardo asked me “Do idempotents split in HoTT”? This post is an answer to that question.
A universal property, in the sense of category theory, generally expresses that a map involving hom-sets, induced by composition with some canonical map(s), is an isomorphism. In type theory we express this using equivalences of hom-types. For instance, the universal … Continue reading
One of the fundamental constructions of classical homotopy theory is the Postnikov tower of a space X. In homotopy type theory, this is just its tower of truncations: One thing that’s special about this tower is that each map has … Continue reading
In chapter 2 of the HoTT book, we prove theorems (or, in a couple of cases, assert axioms) characterizing the equality types of all the standard type formers. For instance, we have and (that’s function extensionality) and (that’s univalence). However, … Continue reading